Stay Connected With Us.
Apr 15, · It seems to be a trend indicator, and some traders only use this one. I wonder if it is a good one for currrencies, and how to read it. Could somebody please tell me. Watch movies and TV shows online. Watch from devices like iOS, Android, PC, PS4, Xbox One and more. Registration is % free and easy.
Trades only in the direction of the trend if the price is above EMA 21 only buy,. The blue dot of Neuro Impulse is confirmed by: Elder Impulse candle color green and blue,. The red dot of Neuro Impulse is confirmed by: Elder Impulse candle color red and blue,. This Trading System is also good for trading without Binary Options. In the pictures Neuro Impulse Binary System in action. Share your opinion, can help everyone to understand the forex strategy.
The attack of the Viper 20 Binary Options Strategy: Reversal Channel 29 Binary Options Strategy: Buy Call The blue dot of Neuro Impulse is confirmed by: This article is not intended for a serious study of the PRNG quality otherwise, we would have had to conduct 15 different tests. We are most interested in the PRNG properties that can affect the Labouchere system testing results and do not require too complex verification procedures.
The script will have 2 parameters:. Number of millions of bit random words it should generate one bit word per 3 calls of the MathRand function providing 15 significant bits.
The unit of measurement is a usual decimal million instead of 2 raised to the 20th power, since we are going to examine the results visually as well. The CalcSeries logical parameter if the distribution of similar bits series lengths should be calculated. The calculation of a bit series lengths distribution is very resource-intensive increasing the script execution time tenfold.
Therefore, it has been arranged as a separate option. The linear chart scale is not suitable for us since the values we have are extremely scattered the values ranging from 1 to 4 or from 0. Besides, the chart displaying the equilibrium value of the amount of long series in logarithmic scale is shown as a straight line — while the series length is increased by 1, the probability of its occurrence is halved. The amount of zero and one bits corresponds to the equidistant value.
The deviation from equilibrium in percentage decreases as the sample size increases. The distribution of the occurrence rate of certain bytes in the PRNG operation results fluctuates within a narrow range around the equilibrium.
Occurrence rate scatter is reduced as the sample size is increased. Occurrence rate of identical bits series deviates from the equilibrium only if the series are quite long which is quite rare. With the increase of the sample length, the actual occurrence rate "deviation point" moves away from the equilibrium towards increasing of the series length and is always located around the value of inclusions for the entire sequence.
Thus, we have not detected any major statistical flaws in the standard PRNG that are capable of distorting our test results even with the sequences of approximately 3 billion generations 3 generations are used per bit word. The CLabouchere class has turned out to be small enough. Now, it is time to write a simple script having a hundred or so strings. The input parameters are as follows:. The script makes a series of deals till the deposit is lost or the RepeatsCount is reached.
In the latter case, one bits of a pseudorandom number are used as coin tossing results. Approximately, at the 10th launch of the script, we receive a spectacular result — the deposit comprises 46 at the 2 th step. However, the drawdown occurs at the 2 nd step already:. As we can see, the balance fell to critical values twice before the deposit was finally wiped out.
In some cases, the deposit was destroyed within the first few dozens of trades, and there was not even a single case when it showed the maximum lifetime of trades. It would be reasonable to add a parameter defining the amount of funds withdrawn from the trading account. If we manage to withdraw the funds exceeding the initial deposit before it is wiped out, then our initial deposit simply becomes a foreseeable loss. Thus, the new parameter called PocketPercent was implemented. It defines the percentage of successful trades that we withdraw from the trading account and put in the "pocket".
Using the "pocket" money is forbidden, only the funds at the trading account are put to risk. After all, that is how it usually happens in real life. Of course, the deposit should be launched multiple times on a loop it would be quite a mundane task to perform the launch hundreds of times manually.
We should also vary a couple of parameters — PocketPercent and Take the initial bet size , as well as to calculate the average results "pocket" funds and deposit funds, since the deposit is never brought down to the entire 0 but only down to the moment when it is impossible to perform the next trade.
We should have two versions of the script: Recurrent runs mean that we should use the object code. Thus, we develop the "operating code" as the CCoinTest class, while the scripts are made as simple as possible. The code for the one-pass script is so short that I can show it here in full all work, including writing the trade details into a file, is done by the CCoinTest class:.
The purple line "Pocket" balance is very similar to the perfect trading account chart every trader dreams about. But in fact, we should pay more attention to the yellow line total balance of the trade account and the "pocket" , which does not look so good. Besides, the following charts are much more common:. The system actually demonstrates the behavior intended by the author: Sometimes, such an attempt ends in complete failure.
Actually, the system has only two options after entering the drawdown — it may either overcome it, or lose an entire deposit. The initial bet in these examples is 0. In the first example, the basic risk level has been reduced approximately to 0. However, these measures did not save the deposit from failure. Now, let's move to the most exciting part — collecting the results of many experiments.
We are about to find out if the wins on successful deposits can cover the losses on failed ones. Maybe the algorithm proves to be efficient if the initial bet size is lowered thus, providing more protection to the deposit or increased? What profit percentage should we withdraw from a trading account? Will the Labouchere system be any different from the fixed-rate one at all? And what will happen if the initial system has a positive mathematical expectation the "coin" wins more often?
As you can see, there are a lot of questions we should deal with appropriately. The script for launching deposits in the loop with varying parameters consists of about strings. I will show only a few fragments here. As we can see, the initial bet size varies from 5 0.
The parameters are set with a safety margin that overlaps reasonable limits in both directions. Thus, the search space is two-dimensional. The amount of deposits per series is set by the Deposits parameter. The two-dimensional space calculation results are three-dimensional, which means that they are difficult to display by two-dimensional means. To overcome this issue, let's simply draw two-dimensional charts with the x-axis standing for the points' serial numbers from the search space from 0 to If necessary, some certain Takes and PocketPercent values are provided separately.
The deposit lifetime exceeds 10 trades with the initial risk of 0. The high PocketPercent value also reduces the average amount of deals before a deposit is lost. That is an expected result. We can select a few promising points on the chart displaying the average contents of the "pocket" and the balance. Four of the points are located close to each other, so hopefully we can find the optimum area.
As we can see, the supposedly optimum area simply vanished under the pressure of a sufficiently large number of statistical data. Regardless of any parameters, the chart randomly fluctuates near the initial balance of 10 The financial result of the Labouchere system is zero coinciding with that of the fixed-bet system. Unlike the Labouchere system, the fixed-bet one shows increased data scatter around the average value. It seems that the fixed Deposits value does not conform with the statistical behavior of the fixed-bet system too well.
The deposit lifetime is much lower when using the Labouchere system 10 and more times with most parameters and even more than times with certain parameters. In case of a low risk level, we can see that the chart reaches the limitation set by the RepeatsCount parameter the default value is These results partially confirm the popular opinion that the systems capable of increasing the risk level are dangerous for a deposit.
Such systems reduce the deposit lifetime, though we have not discovered any dangers for financial results yet at least on the average and providing that a certain win percentage is withdrawn.
Let's introduce a new script parameter that will allow us to collect sufficient stat data for evaluating the behavior of high-risk areas:. The funds are transferred to the "pocket" only after exiting a drawdown.
In case their deposit is decreasing rapidly, human traders will most probably not perform or even 10 deals till it is completely wiped out. They will surely stop trading much earlier. The fixed-bet system algorithm cannot do that. The Labouchere system algorithm is much more human-like in this regard, since it behaves just like a trader encouraged by new records and trading till the deposit is completely destroyed.
Do you remember the eulogic article I mentioned in the Introduction? In case of a low risk level, the fixed-bet system shows the unlimited "vitality". In other words, it is almost impossible to lose a deposit. However, the Labouchere system is still capable of destroying a deposit but do not forget about the "pocket". The fixed-bet system makes 10 times more profit than the Labouchere with most parameters and sometimes even 17 times more profit with certain parameters. Most readers may think that the fixed-bet system is in all respects superior to the Labouchere.
Not only it protects a deposit better, but also brings 10 times more money! Unfortunately, they are deceived by statistics. The fixed-bet system bumps into the limitation of trades per one deposit. If the RepeatsCount parameter has been , then the system would have made 2 times more profit. And they will be wrong again. Take a look at the chart of the average profits made by the systems per trade in logarithmic scale: The chart of the profit per trade in percentage of the initial bet makes the entire picture even clearer:.
In other words, the wins exceed the losses by 2. The Labouchere system makes more profit even with the most unsuitable parameters. And if the parameters are set correctly, it may yield as much as times more profit. So, it seems that if you have an unlimited amount of time, you can do quite well without the Labouchere system. You may argue that the fixed-bet system can be replaced with the fixed risk percentage system, so that the profit per trade is increased actually, the profit will grow continuously, but we should use similar distances for comparison.
However, in this case, a position volume should be changed for the Labouchere system as well. In fact, we can easily make the same amount of profit using the fixed-bet system. We simply need to raise the bet 7 times from 0. But the fixed-bet system still has 10 times more "vitality" in this case. In fact, it does not matter how many deals your deposit is able to survive on the average, of course , since we put a part of our profits in the "pocket". If the total "pocket" funds exceed the initial account balance several times, the loss of the deposit is not a significant issue.
Perhaps, the most valid conclusion that can be drawn from these calculations is as follows: The Labouchere system reaches the same level of profitability by increasing the position size during its operation". Besides, keep in mind that any statistical conclusions are considered to be valid only after conducting a large number of experiments.
A single virtual account can be virtually split into several deposits. The loss of one virtual deposit means losing a part of the trading account and returning to the initial bet size when a certain risk level is reached.
However, the article shows that simulation of as much as deposits still yields very scattered data. If we split an average trader's deposit into parts, normal trading will be impossible. Which system is better? It is hard to say. The choice depends on traders' preferences, and the mathematical expectation of the initial system is of critical importance here.
The code shown in the article allows anyone to simulate the Labouchere system operation on their own trading system. This happens due to the fact that at a higher expectation of the initial system, the Labouchere system spends less time in drawdowns and therefore, does not have to trade using an increased lot too often. The Labouchere money management system cannot turn a loss-making or even a neutral system into a profitable one. Is the Labouchere system worth trying with a positive expectation system?
The choice is yours. The Labouchere system is quite complicated, and its efficiency can hardly be called outstanding. Anyway, I can give you two tips — do not exceed the acceptable risk level if you care about your deposit and try to improve the mathematical expectation of your trading system.
This article shows how price action and the monitoring of support and resistance levels can be used for well-timed market entry. It discusses a trading system that effectively combines the two for the determination of trade setups. Corresponding MQL4 code is explained that can be utilized in the EAs based on these trading concepts.
The article provides a review of an idea based on the analysis of prices' movement direction and their speed. We have performed its formalization in the MQL4 language presented as an expert advisor to explore viability of the strategy being under consideration.
We also determine the best parameters via check, examination and optimization of an example given in the article. The article deals with managing MetaTrader user interface elements via an auxiliary DLL library using the example of changing push notification delivery settings. The library source code and the sample script are attached to the article.
The article describes the development of a MetaTrader 4 Expert Advisor based on the Inside Bar strategy, including Inside Bar detection principles, as well as pending and stop order setting rules. Test and optimization results are provided as well.
We also determine the best parameters via check, examination and optimization of an example given in the article.
We can recalculate a bet size after exiting a drawdown, however, this will lead to fractional numbers which are difficult to work with.